Richard III: A Villain or a Victim?
This article seeks to give some insight on the controversial figure of Richard III of England. He is known as probably the most maligned monarch in British history and he has come down in history as the man who cleared his way to the throne by eliminating his rivals. He is mostly reviled for murdering his young nephews in the Tower of London. His supporters, however, argue that King Richard is the victim of a smear campaign by the Tudors, who ascended the throne after the death of Richard III in the Battle of Bosworth. They claim that king Richard has been vilified and his reputation has been blackened by Tudor propaganda, as history is written by the victors. Richard III was a typical ruler of his time. He has to be measured by the standards of his time. After 500 years of speculations about the figure of Richard III, there is hope that a wronged monarch might at last find posthumous justice. It proves that it is never too late to save one's reputation.
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies ISSN 2281 3993(Print) ISSN 2281-4612(Online)
Copyright © MCSER-Mediterranean Center of Social and Educational Research
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'mcser.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders..